To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee - : Statements and Themes :: Free Essay Writer

Statements and Themes of To murder a Mockingbird Harper leeward makes some direct statements nigh the thoughts of the public during the mid-nineteen thirties. The simplest way to make a statement in the sassy is through the thoughts of reconnoitre. Scout shapes her character from her fathers advice. One of the principle values Scout attains from genus Atticus appears at the end of the novel when she states, Atticus was right. One beat he said you never really know a globe until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them (279). Lee demonstrates the difference between an adults dread of the world around him and a childs understanding of his environment by creating the character Dolphus Raymond. Dolphus states Secretly, Miss Finch, Im not much of a drinker, but you see they adults could never, never understand that I live desire I do because thats the way I want to live (201). Scout does not understand why Dolphus trusts two children with his secret over an adult and he rep lies, Because youre children and you can understand it (201). Dolphus teaches that it is not until one loses his innocence that he looks on things with prejudice. Stating facts proves to be beneficial when one is trying to express a foreshadow however, the best way to learn is through hump. Atticus gains respect from his children and is competent of teaching them good values because he al downhearteds them to experience some of tone for themselves. For example, both Jem and Scout are allowed to walk into town on their own, gambol by themselves in the yard, and cavort around the neighborhood with Dill during the summer. Atticus allots this freedom and in turn, Jem and Scout gain a sense of license and responsibility. Atticus encouragement of Jems visits to Mrs. Dubose, which proves to be an excellent learning environment for Jem. Not still does he learn how to behave in a gentleman-like manner, but he learns of a courage that exists without physical violence. Atticus also per mits the children to watch the running play of Tom Robinson. Bob Ewells testimony exhibits poor language and a low value system. His mannerisms are contrary to those of Tom Robinson, who portrays himself as a ministrant and respectful man. The trial of Tom Robinson proves to be the most beneficial experience the children could have. Not only do they see their father in a different setting, but they are able to define what constitutes a powerful human being and what amounts to human trash.