Free Julius Caesar Essays: Expediency vs. Ideology :: Julius Caesar Essays

Expediency vs. Ideology in Julius Caesar Expediency is the judgment of doing something fitting, practical, useful, and advisable. It is the suitable means to accomplish an end. Ideology is the body of beliefs or ideas of both person or group. These two words, if put together, clash. It is a battle amongst what is really best between what one thinks and what necessarily to be done. An fine example of this clash is in Shakespeares Julius Caesar. Was the final stage of Caesar something that was done pragmatically or was it an action taken because of certain convictions, an ideology? Was Caesars finish practical? Would it bring about positive change for Roman bon ton? The main reason that the conspirators gave for their action was that if Caesar were crowned king, he would become a tyrant, an oppressor of the Roman people. It was done in the best interests of the Republic. Now that he was dead, Caesar could neer be a tyrant and the Romans could live in freedom. His writ o f execution, therefore, was necessary. Brutus and Cassius took it upon themselves to be the in effect(predicate) forces to kill Caesar. These were expedient men who cared only for Rome. Or were they? The flip fount to being practical and doing what is best for others is taking action because of what one thinks needs to be done and/or actually doing it for selfish reasons. Julius Caesars death also can be considered an ideological decision. In I, ii, ll. 35-180, Cassius brings forth the discern that he thought Brutus could be as good a linguistic rule as Caesar. Why does Cassius bring this up? What does he get from reflexion this? One might say that these were encouraging words from one maven to another. However, these words serve as a catalyst for Brutus plan to run into Caesar. Among the conspirators, did they have any motives behind their participation in Caesars murder?