Against Proposition 69 and the DNA Fingerprint Act Essay -- DNA Databa

Abstractcalciums hint 69 and the deoxyribonucleic acid reproduce Act both expand twist deoxyribonucleic acid databasesfar beyond what is necessary to protect citizens and prosecute risky crime. deoxyribonucleic acid profilingtechniques and databases have developed largely over the depart fifteen years, and the recentexpansions are only a part of an ongoing trend of sound creep that characterizes databaseexpansion. offer 69 and the desoxyribonucleic acid Fingerprint Act expand DNA databases originallydesigned to house DNA samples from violent criminals to include samples from anyone arrestedfor a felony crime. This is unreasonable because numerous persons arrested for felonies are of all timeconvicted or even tried, but under these expansions their DNA will be stored in a criminal DNAdatabase alongside convicted rapists, murderers, and other felons.California Proposition 69 and the DNA Fingerprint ActConsiderable Expansions in Criminal DNA DatabasesProposition 69, passed last November by voters in California, and the DNA FingerprintAct, passed recently in Congress, both importantly expand DNA databases designed to houseand identify DNA samples from dangerous, violent criminals. These recent expansions are onlypart are only part of a function creep phenomenon that has characterized DNA databaseexpansion since states began keeping DNA profiles on criminal record in the 1990s. Not until recently,however, have the expansions crossed the line between legitimatize DNA profiling for lawenforcement or forensic purposes and an invasion of privacy. Proposition 69 and the DNAFingerprint Act do not significantly improve the ability of law enforcement agencies to prosecuteviolent criminals. Instead, they treat many innocent citizens as criminals, storing their res... ...2048/cgi/content/full/352/26/26692Simoncelli, Tania. Steinhardt, Barry. Californias Proposition 69 A dangerous precedent forcriminal DNA databases. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics. Intern et. cited 2005 Oct 3.Available from http//search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=177686463Rothstein, Mark A. genic justice. The New England Journal of Medicine. Internet. cited2005 Nov 6. Available from http//content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/352/26/26674Proposition 69 DNA samples, collection, database, funding, initiative statute. CaliforniaSecretary of State. Internet. cited 2005 Oct 15. Available fromhttp//222.ss.ca.gov/elections/bp_nov04/prop_60_entire.pdfSenate reauthorizes violence against women 5 act. Senator Jon Kyl Press Office. Internet. cited2005 Oct 15. Available from http//kyl.senate/gov/record.cfm?id=246925