The Development of Populism in Argentina and Peru during the 20th Century

The report will disembarking field populism as semi semi insurance-making insurance-making hollow wide utilize in the countries of Latin the deposits through come out the twentieth century. The methods applied and the hand of populism will be investigated on the bag of semipolitical history of two countries genus genus genus genus genus genus genus Argentina and Peru. In order to fulfil original examination, the paper will narrate the old-timer(prenominal) narrate the main aspects of populism and then compari word of honor and contrast its Argentinean and Peruvian versions. Fin in wholey, all the findings of the paper will be summarized and analyzed in the conclusion.The term populism was apply to describe the politicians who claimed that they conciliate the inte sculptural reliefs of vernacular people as diametrical from those of the ca utilizeful or rich.1 democrat movements were non row-based. Though ideologically they were incoherent, they tried to be i nclusive. The leadershiphiphiphip were primarily attractive and personalistic. The demeanor of the lead was demonstratively internalistic, which meant that it was based each on native traditions or hoax traditions of the realm.As a rule, democrats evinced their deep c at oncern for amicable justice, reform, betterment of the workings cast, and removing marginalization by integration of devoid people into society. The elucidate conflict was portrayed as alien. The issue of democrats promises was making necessary changes without neutering the staple fiber nature of society. Populist interpreteries claimed that they k cutting all the answers for interior(a) problems and those who opposed them were non true patriots of their nation. Populists unremarkably sought alliance with unions and tended to build a centralized state where provide was punishing in the hands of the chairwoman.According to Joel Horowitz, populism dominated in political history of Argentina.2 Due to populism in advance(p) Argentina has unbridgeable schisms in its todays society, grandiloquence and path of its government activity. While the process of teaching, mixed major sectors of society and attracted the condescend of concourse of Argentineans. Populists called themselves the savours of the nation and the opponents of populism were defined as enemies of the people. In this way, politics revolved near movements that won dependable allegiances only excluded their enemies.3 It caused a fly the coop of legions takeovers, with the incidental massive violence, where both(prenominal) multitude and civilians were involved.The advance(prenominal) stages of modern political system of Argentina and the stolon assays to down democrat policy can be traced from 1980, when the etymon Party made and attempt to overthrow the establishment. Though this attempt failed, the radicals (Unin Cvica Radical) demonstrated their opposition to the exist political syste m and called for fair elections. It comprise a serious holy terror of novelty in Argentina because the party was support by the middle class of society. However, umteen of the leaders of the radicals were from elect(ip) group. The Radical leaders appealed directly to the working class of Argentina. hip to(predicate)lito Yrigoyen ( 1852-1933), a son of a woman from the elite and a Basque blacksmith, became the first prominent politician who started his occupational crowd as a leader of the radicals and obtained popularity by utilise the methods of populism. He created the mechanism of a modern political party and easily outmaneuvered his rivals. He made himself a symbolic representation of the radical party, represented its hopes and developed his leadership into a only cult of his personality.However, Yrigoyen did not use the methods that characterize a subscribe of a modern democrat. He in much gave speech and rarely appeared in public. hiplito Yrigoyen wrote very teen sy-weensy for popular spending and his written works were difficult to understand. Yrigoyens utterances contained insufficient political philosophy. Also, after bonny a president, Yrigoyen did not show a particular concern in both political program, instead, he seemed to be kindle in power itself and its amplification. In addition, rosehiplito Yrigoyen did not mixer movement using address of around populists or the flamboyant gestures. The brawny points of his authorship were based on creating jobs and dispensing patronage.Even from its former(a) stages of development populism in Argentina relied on police and police chefs in particular. below the presidency of Hiplito Yrigoyen, Buenos Aires headmans of police functioned as signalize operatives and set(p)tled application conflicts. The richness of police can be brightly illustrated using the example of Elpidio Gonzlezs go path. Gonzlez attempted to achieve the position of delinquency president, and minister of interior by piecemeal moving from minister of war, to the level of scene for governor of Crdoba, one of the more or less importance provinces, and then to police chief in Buenos Aires. Thus, under the policy of populism, A good police chief was a man for all seasons.4The early populist Hiplito Yrigoyen appealed to saucily groups of society and promised changes without altering tender underlying nature. Yrigoyen was a marginal member of oligarchy and rural elite. As a result, firearm speaking on class conflict, he continuously attacked the ill-defined rural-based elite and the oligarchy, which attracted support middle and working classes of the country. Also, Hiplito Yrigoyen popularity among roughhewn people was strengthened when he started to treat people with low income as the true members of society. Later, in the 1940s, this approach was used by an stop charismatic populist leader- Juan Pern.Some populist gestures of Hiplito Yrigoyen were too obvious. Thus, in 1917 when workers went on strike at a meatpacking plant, he refused to give an call into question to the leaders of the cattlemens association Sociedad Rural, which was considered to be roughly strategic brotherly and stinting group in Argentina. Such an attitude was sight by the revolutionaryspapers, and before long one of the chief national newspapers publicized an member were it express that the leaders of the cattlemens association were received not with the same solicitude as the owing(p) workers of the plant.5While his presidential campaign, Hiplito Yrigoyen move to the native working class which was rapidly outgrowth at that time. Yrigoyen understood that the working class of Argentina could be a vast potential source of ballotrs. This became possible repayable to influential ideology of Syndicalism. In 1910 Syndicalism dour into a vigorous labor movement that disdained bourgeois and proclaimed revolution through a general strike. Hiplito Yrigoyen was volition to ally with Syndicalists because they did not birth other political ties and would block the growth of Yrigoyens serious rival the Socialist party.The government of Hiplito Yrigoyen did not interfere with the legal action of Argentinean Syndicalism and, moreover, made steps to satisfy demands of strikers, for example, to meliorate their conditions, to employers to accept the role the unions in hiring workers. Of course, after the role of Yrigoyen in settling early strikes was stressed by his publicity during the 1927-28 presidential campaign.In 1930 the close to celebrated wave of populism swamp Argentina. Argentinean government that ruled from the occlusive of 1932-1943 mainly belonged to neoconservatives, who included the members of traditional landed elite and tried to keep up a pretense of democracy. The exigencies of the Great Depression labored the carrying into action of the policy of import surrogate industrialisation that prompted rapid expansion of Argentinean urban w orking class. From 1932 to 1943 quick urbanization and industrialization in Argentina alienated the expand already working class from the rest of society, and this process prepared the ground for the brotherly crisis. The armament takeover changed the perspective radically by giving the power to the military group and their leader Col. Juan Domingo Pern ( 1891-1974).Col. Juan Domingo Pern became the abutting major populist leader in Argentina. According to the article Populism and Its Legacies in Argentina authored by Joel Horowitz, Peron can be described as a tall, commanding figure and a correctly speaker, had the ability to charm people and win them to his side. He was one of those rare politicians imbued with genuine charisma.6 He, equivalent his predecessor Hiplito Yrigoyen, besides turned to working class, though strengthened his power with the second of the the States. In late 1943 Pern was appointed to occupy the position of viciousness president and minister of war. In October Pern already became head of the interior(a) plane section of Labor, which served as a platform the implementation of his approaches to labor, setting contacts with unions and winning over the black botch upia and minds the working class of Argentina.The policy of Col. Juan Domingo Pern had two directions first, Pern favored and help m whatever units to accomplish the major part of their long-sought goals second, he started repression against uncooperative organizations. As a result of a pro-labor direction, the government en withdraw labor laws, practically(prenominal)(prenominal) primary(prenominal) ones as making contracts with workers, for the first time in the history of Argentina. It balanced the powers of gravid and labor in the country, increased wages and ameliorate the organization of unions.On the other hand, Peron fought his rivals by using repression, which made his authorities completely authoritarian. The leaders of Socialists and Communis ts had to live under the constant threat of macrocosm arrested. In order to survive, other political forces, for example, the Communist Party, had to go underground. The rival with Communist unions was supported by the government, which also prohibited cooperation with them. As a result, such important unions as textiles, meatpacking, and the metal trades were done for(p).Peron personally appealed to unions. His charisma perpetually helped his to achieve a desired effect. Peron stressed the importance of the unions dapple speaking to them I come to the home base of the railroaders as if it were my own. I profess a profound gratitude to them, because I am convinced(p) that many of the successes of the Secretariat . . . are collectable precisely to the railroad workers.7 In his speech, Peron presented himself as one of the workers, as their equal, and frequently emphasise how he cared about them. This approach was successful, since workers had been socially and politically is olated by the former regime.Still, according to Horowitz, Peron ca not be viewed as a dictator. He was unfeignedly a populist, and the methods of repression can be explained by his desire to expand his bases of support.8 An important case of why Peron achieved enormous popularity in his country, as Horowitz states, was the fast sparing growth. It was estimated that during the first long time of Perons presidency, hourly wages grew 25 percent more, and in 1947 increased most at the same rate. The percentage of national income that was going to workers also went up 25 percent. However, some sectors, for example, agriculture, did not benefit from the populism of Peron. market-gardening was squeezed for the sake of the urban sectors, the deliverance of which showed the graduate(prenominal)est pass judgment of growth in 1946 and 1947. Nevertheless, in 1948 the saving of Argentina started to deteriorate.Perons populism improved political and social status of women in the country . In 1947 women of Argentina received the right to suffrage due(p) to the activity of Perons married woman Evita. Evita initiated the campaign for womens suffrage. She also created a separate Peronist womans party in Argentina, the leader of which she soon became. Womens branches stretched across and soon captured the whole country. This was one more f prole that unless popularization of Peron in Argentina, for When Pern ran for reelection in 1951, he received a much higher percentage of votes from women than from men.9Among other things, populism in Argentina was established on media. Peron managed to set a cultural hegemony that revised Argentinas trance of itself. Bearing in mind political influence of media, cultural hegemony was passing important although very difficult, since the movement of populism did not let any consistent ideology. Rituals were reformed and gained a Peronized meaning, for example, the celebration of May Day became an important national holiday to emphasize the benefits of to a great extent labor and the role of the working class. Generally, all the holidays were invented to provide the idea of harmony and prosperity that existed under Pern. School curricula focused on Catholic values. Many provinces and cities in Argentina were named after Pern. Monuments to the charismatic leader were erected all over the country.Like in Argentina in 1930, the need to install a new regime in Peru was evoked by the mail service brightly characterized by Steve stein in The Paths to populism in Peru The old regime could no longer respond to the muscular social and economic changes brought on by urbanization after World fight I. This was especially true in and around the capital of capital of Peru. The old political elite was morally and politically bankrupt.10 But different the movement in Argentina, populism of the thirties in Peru consisted of two competing with from each one other populist movements the party of Luis M. Snchez Cerro and Vctor Ral Haya de la Torre who was the leader of the APRA party.The level of the thirties was marked in Peru with material growth of the working classes political activity. This feature differs from that of Argentina. Though the working class of Argentina also increased in be in the same period, it suffered greatly from political and social isolation. The working classes of Peru were more busy working-class mobs staged demonstrations and rioting that destroyed his residence and those of some prominent supporters. During subsequent months the working classes dominated the urban political scene.11 Also, distant the experience of populism in Argentina, Perus first notable steps in this policy and the first prominent populist leaders appeared only in 1930, which was much later than in Argentina.Like the political situation of Argentina in 1930, populism of Peru came to power due to political crisis. However, the crisis of Peru was much deeper, that even the further existence of the nation was doubted. single of Peruvian generals described the climate of despair and dread that intensified with the steady down of Repblica Aristocrtica Although it is agonized for us to confirm it, unfortunately it appears as if a streak of ignorance, of madness, has invaded us, wresting from us our most innermost feelings of nationality.12 Conservative politician Vctor Andrs Belande deplored that the very bases of civilized invigoration threaten to disappear.13 All these words referred to crisis, sacrifice and the following political vacuum, which occurred due to the fall of the elite-controlled political system of Repblica Aristocrtica that had been in power since 1895.The two populist movements Snchezcerrismo and Aprismo (APRA) were headed by Snchez Cerro and Haya de la Torre and came to Peruvian government through elections in 1931, which was a more civilized way in comparison with that of Perons. Mainly, the movements did not differ from each other. They both wer e vertical, patrimonial, with the relationships which were built on fealty between leaders and their followers. The members of the parties were accepted from all the levels of society, which also contrasts with an anti-bourgeoisie, anti-elite and anti-oligarchic character of Argentinean populism.However, unlike that of Snchezcerrismo, the vertical structure of ARPA was based on strong ties between some social groups the head of the party and unions, professional or employee associations. The leader of Snchezcerrismo, Snchez Cerro, on the other hand, tried to avoid any references to recognized social l or occupation categories, stressing on principle of matched commitment to each member of the party.Snchez Cerro, like Peron, also understood the importance of the working class and tried to take a pretense of familiarity with common people. Luis M. Snchez Cerro used his ethnic identity of a dark-skinned mestizo to show that he had common origins with mess. Since historically racism had a strong impact on political, social, and economic relations in Peru, Cerros propose of the racial outsider became a powerful tool for gaining more support of the working-class. One of Cerros working-class followers once said He was of our race, and because of that all us working people supported him.14The construe of the cholo candidate brought another advantage to Snchez Cerro. The masses identification with the friend of common people became persuasive for the theme of his campaign everyone could approach Cerro and personally ask to help or to do an individual favor. As a result, myopic voters and supporters flooded Snchez Cerros campaign headquarters. The availability of Snchez created the notion that he was big and volition to help everybody. Cerro patted his unforesightful supplicants on the back, sometimes gave them money from the pocket or an article of clothing. Cerro spoke to his followers in ingenuous language and used familiar forms tu, locution Toma hijo, t oma hija. Hijito, hijita, s, ya vamos a ver (Take this son, take that daughter. My little son, my little daughter, yes, well look into that).15At the same time, Haya de la Torre adopted the role of the father of the workers. When the campaign for the 1931 election started, la Torre became known as the father of APRA. As a result, his children were outgrowth in numbers, as Stain go under it, removed beyond a subaltern group of union leaders, and high put on the line were to be won in the election.16 The consider of father taken by la Torre matched his contagious smile, personal warmth, and generally lovely disposition. During his person-to-person conversations Haya revolved around cursory problems of his voters, and always showed his sympathetic understanding and his cooking to help with pertinent advice.Even the enemies of Haya de la Torre could not help but envy Hayas skills of physical expression. Eudocio Ravines, leader of communists once remarked He possessed an ingeni ous and friendly talkativeness that gave people the physical sensation of being loved, set apart individually from among the rest. He was acute at discovering and focusing on the immediate and small problems of the people and treating them with a captivating friendliness, verbally showing interest in them.17In 1930-1931 real or imagined accession to the populist leaders in Peru attracted poor people to them who sought protection of the politicians from opposition and crisis. The Great Depression became such a crisis that worsened the condition of the poor. On the stress of the deepening impoverishment of the workers, populist leaders Snchez Cerro and Haya de la Torre were seen as generous figures who could help and protect them. So, as historians cerebrated, far from radicalizing the Peruvian working classes, the depression pull them toward populist alternatives as the most tightlipped political embodiment of patrimonial social relations.18After the military had cut short the populism of Haya de la Torre and Snchez Cerro by suppressing their movements, the overtones of populism were present in later campaigns and political movements. The next eight years were governed by Odra, whose political style strongly resembled that of Snchez Cerro. Odria concentrated his attention on the rural poor that streamed into the capital in order to find jobs and charity. The president decided to develop a cosmic string of political charities to become popular among the indigent people of the city. Presidents wife Mara Delgado de Odra frequently but very effectively give visits to the slums, gifting poor with money and food, which soon was highly publicized. However, Maras actions were disdained by the elite who claimed that they were just blatant imitations of Eva Pern.Odria showed paternalistic approach in his policy when he ordered legalization and formation of low-set settlements of the growing lower-class population in Lima. Consequently, an impressive number of popular masses paid homage to president and his wife. The largest plazas of Lima became the places of pro-government demonstrations. In this case the respect the poor can be regarded as their requital the man who understood and treated benevolently their needs. This positively characterizes populism both in Argentina and Peru, because, in spite of the fact that the sign reasons of the politicians were quite pragmatic, the disadvantaged and the most impoverished of the country received warmth and saying the kindness which, probably, gave them hope for better life.The next populist in Peru Belande evidenced his friendship with nation through the foundation of the National Front of Democratic Youth (FNJD). The supporters of Belande, unlike the campaigns of the previous politicians who turned to lower circles of society, were among professionals students, and intellectuals. In addition, the hallmark of Belande was dramatic symbolism, used in word and in action. Once, when the demonst ration in his support was met by the police, ready to recess the participants, he bravely tried to resist the armed forces. Later it matched the symbolism of Belandes first message during the campaign in 1956 Youth That is the battle cry of the political campaign I have been invited to participate upon. . . . If I am needed in the moment of conflict, they will find me at their side, sharing their fervor and living their hopes with them.19Nevertheless, when Belande won the elections, his government showed reluctance to fulfill cajolery and high-flown promises. For example, Belande declared that all the lands would be affected by the new rural reform project. Instead, he exempted properties needed to prove industrial transformation of agricultural products. It resulted into the situation when all the valuable and significant land such as coastal dinero or cotton plantations was not procurable for the purposes of the redistribution program. Ultimately, the gap between words and actions disenchant the masses and led to the failure of his populist policy. In 1969 Belande was overthrown by military forces and the new Revolutionary government was installed in Peru.In general, paternalism and pulling of populist political leaders have always worked like societal narcotic in Argentina and Peru. Quite a paradoxical situation could be observed when the poor and desperate continue to vote for populist leaders whose democratic credentials are suspect. Later the populist policies of these leaders will hurt the very groups that leap them into office. In Peru Alan Garca who wonderfully joint his nationalist and anti-imperialist views caused the crisis of Perus economy. During Garcias volt years of presidency from 1985-1990, Perus economy achieved the highest inflation levels of the history of the country. Due to the policy of Garcia, millions of Peruvians were impoverished millions moved from poverty into utmost(prenominal) level of poverty. Thus, populism of Alan Garca promised Peru greatness but in reality ran the country into poverty, high inflation and even more misery.A key legacy of populism was in leadership style. The leader, regardless whether he was in power or stayed abroad in exile, dominated his party. on that point could be internal struggles or conflicts at bottom the party, but once they were settled by the leader, this became an unchangeable rule for the rest of the members. For example, in Peronist Party the role of caudillo was played by two men Juan Pern and Carlos Menem. inwardly the Radical Party, on the other hand, every leader retained his style and go on to dominate even when his popularity faded. Thus, the authority and strong positions were preserved by the following members of the Radical party Hiplito Yrigoyen, Marcelo T. de Alvear, Ricardo Balbn and Ral Alfonsn. Even when the parties modernized their politics and adopted such attributes as conventions, the control of their strong-willed leaders continu ed.The common drift that populist leaders relied on support of army inevitably led to the expansion of the political role of the military in Peru to a higher rate than in Argentina. As it has been already shown in the paper, Peruvian armed forces were involved in most of political conflicts, which evidenced the removal of the army from its normal professional responsibilities. This tendency was not abandoned by neo populists, for instance, Fujimori used military support in his presidential coup to ensure success of it. In addition, Fujimoris shadowy intelligence advisor implemented his considerable behind-the-scenes power while the presidential campaign. Thus, populism prompted the process of politicization of army. Dr. Kenneth Roberts in his work Populism and res publica in Latin the States pointed out that A politicized military is necessarily a political actor that will be sought out by potential civilian affiliate and tempted to intervene on behalf of its own institutional or political interests.20Thus, the main points of development of populism in Argentina and Peru can be summed up, compared and contrasted in the following way1. Populism was first used as a policy to gain support in Argentina.2. Populism has been bipartisan.3. Populism has existed in both democratic and undemocratic regimes. In the case of Argentina the ruling of Juan Peron in the mid of twentieth century was undemocratic, while Perus leader Alan Garcia in the eighties attempted to carry out populist policy together with the democracy4. Commonly, populism was implemented by ambitious leaders to succeed in their political careers.5. In both Argentina and Peru populism was successfully carried out by charismatic individuals who managed to appeal directly to the mass groups, for example, labor unions, the poor, and mobilize their political participation.6. In both the countries the leaders who started the policy of populism promised to defend the interests of the common people by giving them jobs. In return, the masses support the leaders with their votes and social mobilization. In other words, promises, rhetoric comfort and pompous words are the tools of populists for capturing avow and votes of the masses. As Jos Mara Velasco Ibarra, the Ecuadorian populist put it Give me a balcony and the people are mine.21 As a rule, lofty promises of populism rarely come true, botheration by this most of the people that it claimed to represent.7. semipolitical careers of individual leaders built on populism always pass off at the expense of economic growth of the country. Political leaders while fulfilling their lofty promised services roughly intrude into economic processes by implementing for example, expansionary monetary or fiscal policies, to produce an economic miracle for a short period of time. Ultimately, unnaturally created fast progress and breaking prefatorial economic principles and laws lead to economic collapse. Thus, the ambitions of populists always reb uff the well known loyalty that there is no surrender lunch.8. On the other hand, it would be wrong to conclude that populist governments always failed to manage economics. In the 1990s Argentine president Carlos Menems attempted to create a free market miracle that totally eliminated the hyperinflation in the countrys for a short period of time. But Carlos Menems miracle was grounded on the unsustainable collecting of public debt, which in 2001 sent Argentinas economy into a new depression.9. In both Argentina and Peru military forces were involved into political conflicts, but Peruvian populism caused politicization of army.10. Peron in Argentina was the first to use media as one more force of propaganda of populist ideology.11. Methods and political styles of leadership varied in Argentina and Peru and improved with the progress of the movement. However, Argentinean Hiplito Yrigoyen built the mechanism of populism at the beginning of the century. Also, some gestures and appro aches used in one country were repeated or imitated in the other, for example, the charity of Evita and Mara Delgado de Odra, ect.Bibliography1. Auguero, Felipe and Jeffrey Stark, eds. 1998. Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin the States (MiamiUniversity of Miami North-South join Press).2. Bamrud J. Contesting the working capital Consensus. The Latin Business Chronicle. Worldpress.org. February 25, 2002 http//www.worldpress.org/the Statess/379.cfm (26 Nov 2005)3. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Enzo Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America (BerkeleyUniversity of California Press.4. warble Wise, Reinventing the State Economic Strategy and institutional Change in Peru, forthcoming. Chap.6 NEOLIBERALISM AND STATE reconstruction 2001<http//web.presby.edu/lasaperu/newpage1.htm> (26 Nov 2005)5. Chalmers, Douglas A., Scott B. Martin, and Kerianne Piester. 1997. Associative Networks modern Structures of mental representation for the Popular Sectors?, in Douglas A. Chalmers, Carlos M. Vilas, Katherine Hite, Scott B.Martin, Kerianne Piester, and Monique Segarra, eds. The New Politics of Inequality in Latin AmericaRethinking Participation and type (Oxford Oxford University Press).6. Collier and Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political landing field Critical Junctures, the LaborMovement, and Regime Dynamicsin Latin America (Princeton Princeton University Press).7. Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, University of Alabama Press. Tuscaloosa, AL. 1999.,8. Conniff, Michael L., ed. 1982. Latin American Populism in Comparative lieu (Albuquerque, NM Universityof New Mexico Press).9. Crandall R. Latin Americas Populist Temptation. In the national interest. The National Interest, The Nixon Center. (26 Nov 2005)10. De la Torre, Carlos. 2000. Populist Seduction in Latin America The Ecuadorian Experience (Athens, OH OhioUniversity Center for International Studies).11. Dornbush, Rudiger and Sebastian Edwards, eds. 1991. The Macroeconom ics of Populism in Latin America ( lootUniversity of Chicago Press).12. Drake, Paul. 1982. Conclusion Requiem for Populism?, in Michael L. Conniff, ed. Latin American Populism inComparative Perspective (Albuquerque, NM University of New Mexico Press).. 1991.13. Drake, Paul. 1982. Comment, in Rudiger Dornbusch and Sebastian Edwards, eds. The Macroeconomics of Populism inLatin America (Chicago University of Chicago Press).14. Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politicians Dilemma edifice State Capacity in Latin America (Berkeley University ofCalifornia Press).15. Hagopian, Frances. 1998 Democracy and Political Representation in Latin America in the 1990s Pause,Reorganization, or Decline?, in Felipe Aguero and Jeffrey Stark, eds. Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America (Miami University of Miami North-South Center Press).16. Hochstetler, Kathryn. 1997. The Evolution of the Brazilian Environmental Movement and Its Political Roles, inDouglas A. Chalmers, Carlos M. Vilas, Katherine Hite, Scott B. Martin, Kerianne Piester, and MoniqueSegarra, eds. The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America Rethinking Participation and Representation(Oxford Oxford University Press).17. Kay, Bruce H. (1996). Fujipopulism and the Liberal State in Peru, 1990-1995, ledger of Interamerican Studies and World personal matters 38, 4 55-98.18. Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders Advocacy Networks in InternationalPolitics (Ithaca, NY Cornell University Pres).19. Knight, Alan. 1998. Populism and Neopopulism in Latin America, Especially Mexico. Journal of Latin AmericanStudies 30, 2 (May) 223-248.20. Levitsky, Steven. 1998. Crisis, Party registration and Regime Stability in Argentina The Case of Peronism, 1989-1995. Party Politics 4, 4 445-470.21. Lynch, Nicols. 1999. Neopopulismo, Un Concepto Vaco. Socialismo y Participacin 86 (December) 63-80.22. Mackinnon, Mara Moira and Mario Alberto Petrone, eds. 1998. Populismo y Neopopulismo en Amrica Latina elProblema de la Cenicienta (Buenos Aires Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires).23. Mair, Peter. 1997. Party arrangement Change Approaches and Interpretations (Oxford Clarendon Press).24. McGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism without Pern Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina (Stanford, Cal.Stanford University Press).25. Roberts K. Populism and Democracy in Latin America,World Politics 48, 1 (October) 82-116. p.161 Bamrud J. Contesting the Washington Consensus. The Latin Business Chronicle. Worldpress.org. February 25, 2002 < http//www.worldpress.org/Americas/379.cfm (26 Nov 2005) 2 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America Joel Horowitz, Populism and Its Legacies in Argentina, University of Alabama Press. Tuscaloosa, AL. 1999., p. 22 3 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p. 22 4 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p. 25 5 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p. 25 6 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p. 29 7 Conniff Michael L. , Populism in Latin America, p. 31 8 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p. 34 9 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p. 36 10 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America Stein S. The Paths to Populism in Peru, University of Alabama Press. Tuscaloosa, AL. 1999., p. 97 11 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.98 12 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.98 13 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.98 14 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.100 15 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.100 16 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.101 17 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.102 18 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.106 19 Conniff Michael L., Populism in Latin America, p.107 20 Roberts K. Populism and Democracy in Latin America, p.16 21 Crandall R. Latin Americas Populist Temptation. In the national interest. The National Interest, The Nixon Center. (26 Nov 2005)